• This is default featured slide 1 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by NewBloggerThemes.com.

  • This is default featured slide 2 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by NewBloggerThemes.com.

  • This is default featured slide 3 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by NewBloggerThemes.com.

  • This is default featured slide 4 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by NewBloggerThemes.com.

  • This is default featured slide 5 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by NewBloggerThemes.com.

Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Adventure. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Adventure. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Island of Lost Souls (1932)

Directed by Erle C. Kenton, who was known more for his two reel comedies, but branched out into horror on a few occasions. This will probably be his only lasting film. Recently released in high definition, sadly I didn't know this until I had already watched a very grainy version.

The film stars Charles Laughton [who won an Oscar the following year for The Private Life of Henry VIII.] and Richard Arlen [who was in the silent film Wings... the first Oscar Best Picture]. Bela Lugosi is on the credit pretty high, but his role is very minor, and he is in costume so you wouldn't know unless told. The film is in my 101 horror movies book, but I didn't find it scary in the least. If this was a modern film you would consider it an adventure/fantasy.

The story is about a man, Edward [Arlen], who is found adrift at sea. The boat that finds him is on their way, with an assortment of animals, to an island not on any map. When Edward sticks up for a servant against the drunken captain he boots him off the ship at the mysterious island. The island belongs to Dr. Moreau [a character with about five films to his credit now, the rest much more recent], a mad scientist who does Frankenstein-like operations on animals making them more human.

Horror movies must have soundtracks, suspenseful music sets the mood, awkward silence unsettles us, but a complete lack of background effects or score make the film dull. This isn't the only reason this film was boring, but it just wasn't that interesting and just a little too fake for me. Sure it is very old, but that isn't exactly why. I'm not sure why this needs to be on any lists, and a 6/10 is very generous.

Vote: 6/10

IMDB Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0024188/
Share:

Sanctum (2011)

I really didn't think this was a "horror" but I was expecting it to be a thriller. I was under the assumption that this was some sort of combination of The Abyss and The Descent. I was quite wrong.

James Cameron was an executive producer on this film, again I was under the assumption that he directed this. I'm sure others were also since his name is at the top of the movie poster with this last film, Avatar, mentioned. Don't be fooled. This was directed bu Alister Grierson, and he hasn't done anything you've seen.

The film is about a group if scientists that are exploring a cave system that has never been accessed in the history of mankind. While deep in the cave a tropical storm hits. At their depth they have no sign of the storm, and the radio communication to the ground level are out. With no warning water starts to fill up the cave. They are forced to continue to the other side [e.g. - we know the water in the cave feeds a river].

The problem with the film is the horrendous acting. Father [Richard Roxburgh] and son [Rhys Wakefield] were not good, and bad guy Ioan Gruffudd wasn't any better. Wakefield reminds me of the Hayden Christensen in the Star Wars films.

Don't get suckered into watching this because they put Cameron's name on it.

Vote: 5/10

IMDB Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0881320/
Share:

Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides (2011)

The fourth film in the Pirates series, this one of course uses the 3D gimmick, and replaces Keira Knightley with Penélope Cruz in the leading lady role. Part of me gets annoyed that this series is still going, while part of me is happy that something other than really bad horror films keeps their series going. What about James Bond or Star Trek, we don't say "really? they are making another one?" For me it helps that it is still Johnny Depp, if they replace him I'll stop watching [I don't see this happening].

So we've fought pirate ghosts then the kracken, recovered the heart of Davey Jones, and gone to the edge of the world in the previous films. This time we fight Blackbeard and search for the fountain of youth. The film is full of daring and silly escapes, it almost reaches the Bugs Bunny level when Jack Sparrow gets out of the king quarters and escapes the Spanish troops by swinging on trees. It makes it clear that there will be more films in the future, no surprise, and if this annoys you then why even start watching this one, right?

Could it have been better? Yes. Did I dislike the storyline, costumes, music, etc.? No. Could the dialogue have been better... definitely. We started to slip into kids movie realm with this film, which might be hard for the series to recover from. Guess we'll see in a few years.

Vote: 6/10

IMDB Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1298650/
Share:

The Mission (1986)

As I was putting together a movie list from my 501 Must See Movie book I came across this film and wanted to see it right away. I found it at the library the next week, but it still took me a while to get to. Nominated for 7 Oscars including best picture, and winner of 1 [Cinematography], starring Robert De Niro, Jeremy Irons, and Liam Neeson so quite a cast.

Based in the 1700's in remote area of South America ruled by the Portuguese. We start with a tribe of natives strapping a Jesuit missionary to a cross and throwing him over a waterfall [the movie poster]. The church sends in a missionary they felt would have more luck with, Father Gabriel [Jeremy Irons]. He gains the trust of the natives and they start building the church, meanwhile slave traders have hired men to hunt the natives down. Robert De Niro plays Mendoza, who is a slave trader/hunter who after some "family turmoil" begins to turn his life around.

This film starts as an action/adventure, then turns into a political drama for the second half as the church in Portugal gets tangled in the politics of who owns the land the native are own and if the missions can remain on the land. I would have liked more action and less politics, but it was good nonetheless, just not good enough for a worth watching grade.

Vote: 7/10

IMDB Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091530/
Share:

Papillon (1973)

I managed to get ahold of the blu-ray of this epic adventure film and I have to say it was worth the quality. A film starring Steve McQueen and Dustin Hoffman which has everything going for it... except the runtime. Nominated for an Oscar for Best Score, and not necessarily a stunning performance by the stars. A quality film nevertheless.

The film stars McQueen as the title character Papillon [pappy-yawn] who is a prisoner in France serving a life sentence for a murder he was falsely accused of. Much like The Shawshank Redemption we can never really be sure, and like Andy Dufresne escape is his only goal. He is deported to African, French Guiana to be specific, where he is put in a labor camp where officers have little remorse for killing prisoners by starvation, disease, or murder. On the sea ride he befriends Mr. Dega [Dustin Hoffman] a man hated by many because of his legal troubles with counterfeiting. Papillion makes a deal that if he protects him, that he will help them escape.

With the odds against him Papillion survives stints in solitary and attempt after attempt. The run-time of the film adds to the misery of solitary, a feeling you can't get if you rush a epic film like this. Even at 2 1/2 hours I felt the film was well edited and really enjoyed it.

Take the time to check this one out, it is arguably McQueen's best work.

Vote: 8/10

IMDB Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070511/
Share:

The Vikings (1958)

I just kinda had this one left over from action movie month. Not a film from the action book, but an adventure/action from the 501 Must See movie book that actually looked pretty interesting. A pairing of Tony Curtis and Kirk Douglas that probably helped lead to the casting of the two of them together two years later for Spartacus.

The film starts explaining the regular viking raids made on England and we learn of an heir to the throne that has been smuggled off with a special necklace. Tony Curtis plays this man, a viking slave that has the nerve to stand up to the viking prince. The two battle it out through the film as they are forced to team up in a battle eventually squaring off.

I expected Douglas to be the good guy, and in this film he is quite the opposite. Old, but color, and a pretty fun watch. I wouldn't really care to see it again, therefore I won't suggest it. Worthy of the top 50 adventure films nonetheless.

Vote: 7/10

IMDB Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0052365/
Share:

Captain Blood (1935)

The king of swashbuckler film, Mr. Errol Flynn. A man known just as much for his off camera adventures as on. A man charged with statutory rape three times, hence the term "In Like Flynn," he lead a very colorful lifestyle. Known best for his film The Adventures of Robin Hood, which was made three years after this one, but his role as Peter Blood really launched his career. This film was even nominated for 5 Oscars. I watched it because of its inclusion in the Action 101 book, but it is on numerous other lists I working on as well.

The film is about a doctor who is falsely accused of treason after caring for some rebel troops. He is sold into slavery in the West Indies and manages to become the doctor for the governor on the island thanks to a lack of competent doctors on the island. When the French attack he leads a group of slaves to take one of their ships and leads his crew to a life of pirating, since they have no place to call their home.

The bad guys are a little over the top, but that is my only real criticism of the film. It is pretty good, not too long, and a good classic. I'm not sure I can give an exact reason for not rating it any other than 7/10, but I did like it.

Vote: 7/10

IMDB Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0026174/
Share:

The Lives of a Bengal Lancer (1935)

Nominated for 8 Oscars, and winner of two in a dead category "Assistant Director," I guess they were REALLY good at getting coffee on the set. Back where there were 12 best picture nominees [and you think 10 is a lot right now], this film lost to John Ford's The Informer. A selection to the 101 Action Movies book, and one of the oldest in the book.

This film directed by Henry Hathaway, who is best known for his westerns like How the West Was Won. It stars Gary Cooper, at no significant point in his long career other than the year before Mr. Deeds Goes to Town, two decades before he won his first Oscar. The film is about the British military in India fighting rebel forces. Considered an adventure/drama in it's era but more of a war film by today's standards. The scenes of charging men on horseback and shootouts, explosions and sword fighting all make this an action film. The drama between the father and son and Cooper's character really make this a drama more than anything.

It is not always easy to pigeonhole a film into a specific genre, and this one has a little of everything. It was kinda boring at times though, and the supporting actors weren't the best. All in all a good Cooper film but I think he still has better ones.



Vote: 6/10

IMDB Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0026643/
Share:

The Mark of Zorro (1940)

A character than has been portrayed in over 60 films or television series now, how on earth do you single out the best? How about the one nominated for an Oscar, in the National Film Registry, and starring Tyrone Power. A classic film, in color, that focuses on the story and characters instead of the action and sex. not something you find with many good action films.

I really don't think I need to go into the story of Zorro, and I think this one does a great job of not diverging from a classic storyline. So how about some random trivia instead! Once again the Zorro star isn't actually Hispanic, and most leading Zorro actors have not been, which might be why so many people like the Antonio Banderas version. This was the movie that Bruce Wayne's parents saw the night they were murdered in the Batman comics.

Anyways, probably the best Zorro film ever, you need to see this one.

Vote: 9/10

IMDB Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0032762/
Share:

Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time (2010)

Not only is this an action film based on a video game, but is was also produced by Disney. The two contradict each other in so many ways, video games are all about "lives" and killing, and most Disney action movies have little to no death. The first HD movie I watched on my new 7" personal movie player and one of the first new releases for action month.

The film stars Jake Gyllenhaal who really buffed up for this film. Ben Kingsley who looks scary enough to be a henchman, and the very attractive Gemma Arterton [who you wouldn't recognize as a redhead in Quantum of Solace, a British actress that has been in very minor roles in a number of films now]. The premise is that King Sharaman find a boy risking his life while standing up for a stranger in the market. He takes him in as a son, who fearlessly helps lead in his army. A magic dagger that can turn back time falls into his hands and he has figure out how to right some wrong against the king that he is being accused of.

Cheesy and cookie cutter in many ways. A mix between action, adventure, and fantasy it was just ok in many ways. It was an exciting watch and not too long, predictable but no big plot holes for a fantasy with time travel. I wouldn't suggest this one though.

Vote: 6/10

IMDB Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0473075/
Share:

The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (2010)

Growing up I read the first three books in this seven book series. This was the last one I read and chronicles the voyages of Prince Caspian. It is the least interesting book from what I remember, but it is the best film so far in the series. With less than 1/2 the votes on imdb so far than the 2nd my guess is this film didn't get enough publicity or people have given up on this series.

The director of the first two Andrew Adamson was replaced by Michael Apted, which might have been what this series needed. Peter [William Moseley] and Susan [Anna Popplewell] are now minor characters and Edmund [Skandar Keynes] and Lucy [Georgie Henley] become the main characters. Either they are better actors or the director just did better with their lines because this film was a huge improvement.

I now really look forward to the fourth film in the series, the first that I haven't read and with a better director now have me interested again.

So the film starts with Lucy and Edmund staying with their Uncle while World War II breaks out in England, they are pulled into Narnia and aboard the Dawn Treader where Caspian is searching for some lost swords. The film has a lot more religious implications than the previous ones, but it is vague enough for kids to not connect. I really enjoyed this film, maybe because it was just much better than I was expecting.

Vote: 8/10

IMDB Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0980970/
Share:

The Way Back (2010)

So the Russian film about escaping Siberia [The Edge: Kray] was nominated for a golden globe, and the American film with a similar concept was nominated for an Oscar.

Jim Sturgess (Across the Universe and 21) stars in a film based on true events about a small group that escape a Siberian gulag walking ~4000 miles to freedom in India. With quality performances by Colin Farrell, Ed Harris, and Saoirse Ronan, this was not a bad film at all. The nomination was not for acting through, it was for make-up and it lost the Oscar to The Wolfman, in a category where more is better it had no chance. It was more a combination of good scenery, good make-up, and good costumes; than great make-up alone.

Since you are told from the start that this is based on a true story of men actually making it to freedom it is hard to really spoil the film since the director did this for you. The amazing thing about the movie is the men's ability to survive in both extreme conditions. They start in freezing conditions and then end by crossing a desert. Personally I think I have a better chance at a desert [since I've always lived in a hot climate], and I'm pretty sure I would have 0% in Siberia.

Anyways, National Geography helped produce this film, and this is one that should be enjoyed in HD.

Vote: 7/10

IMDB Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1023114/
Share:

Robin Hood (2010)

Wow! This was not what I expected at all. Ridley Scott's take on the classic story is much different than you would expect and you need to go into this movie understanding that.

I was very confused the first 20 minutes as I tried to connect what was going on with the story line I am so used to. Don't do this, take it as a completely different story and you will really like it. Marketing this film as "Robin Hood" did not help. A film with a $200 million budget that has yet to reach $106 million with rentals and purchases is burdened by a generic title. I do like Russell Crowe, even though I joke about him "fightin' round the world," but I really don't like Cate Blanchett (I didn't like Elizabeth: The Golden Age, I'm Not There., or Babel to name a few.).

The open ending was frustrating (not meant to be a spoiler), not to talk about details but I don't see how they have enough storyline to make a second. This one takes so many new and different turns that I could see it happening, but I doubt it would be funded since this one stands to lose money. If you haven't see this one I suggest you check it out. Subtitles might be necessary or helpful for some because they talk low and are hard to understand at times.


Vote: 8/10

IMDB Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0955308/
Share:

Rabbit-Proof Fence (2002)

So I really though this was a movie starring Kiefer Sutherland, Kenneth Branagh really looks like him in this movie poster. Based on true events, this film about three aboriginal girls escaping from their government camp to find their mothers across the Australian Outback. Branagh is a pretty minor character in the film, and it is centered around the three girls, Molly especially.

The film is really meant to bring light to the Australian Government's pour handling of the Aboriginal people. The term half-caste is a child that is half aboriginal and half white, those that are more fair skinned were allow to go on to higher learning, those that were darker were held basically in indentured servitude. The end goal was to "breed out" the race, slowly mixing them with the main population.

The plot of the film is following three girls as they are captured and them make an effort to travel by foot along the rabbit proof fence to find their families. The movie is very short, has a good message, and honestly doesn't have much more to it that what was said. It was good but honestly forgettable.

Vote: 7/10

IMDB Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0252444/
Share:

127 Hours (2010)

There is something about Danny Boyle's films that make them easy to identify. He has a style all his own with films such as Trainspotting, The Beach, and Slumdog Millionaire. The film seems to almost channel the colors and sounds of Slumdog, I'm not sure if he was just very happy with how that one turned out or if he was trying to bait another award. A.R. Rahman's style fit Slumdog brilliantly, but with this film the score just seemed a little off.

Anyways, I really like Boyle's work. Although none of his films are my "favorites" per se, from what I've seen they have been above average across the board, and now I'm motivated to see Millions. Which has been ideally sitting on my list for a while.

It is hard not to give away the plot and spoil the movie because the plot is so basic. A rock climber, climbing alone, gets stuck for more than a few days. That is vague enough to keep it exciting if you have been living under a rock [no pun intended]. There are a few supporting actors with very minor roles and limited scenes, but this film is all about James Franco's character, Aron. Based on a true story, don't look it up, it will ruin the surprise. I did like this film, it was gory at times and you should be prepared for some pretty intense scenes. A short film at only 94 minutes, but a simple plot, so it still does even seem to drag out a little at times. A worse director would have made this two and a half hours to try and make you experience the boredom the main character must have been going through.

Definitely one of the films worth seeing this year, Franco made this movie, but I wouldn't give him an Oscar just for making a film watchable by himself. The movie wasn't THAT good, and his role wasn't THAT complex. Check it out for yourself.

Vote: 8/10

IMDB Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1542344/
Share:

Around the World in Eighty Days (1956)

The 1957 Oscar Best Picture winner, a 2 and a half hour family film, with slapstick comedy and bad action scenes. I was a lot more disappointed with this film than I expected. The movie has an intermission around the time they make it too San Francisco and the film turns south at this point.

The first half had silly scenes but the ridiculous cowboy and Indian scenes really did it for me on this one. The only cool thing about this movie is that Buster Keaton plays the train conductor.

If you told me that Shirley MacLaine was in this movie I'd say you had the wrong movie in mind. But that is actually her as the Princess in India.

Watch the remake, it is just as bad, but not worse by any means.

Vote: 6/10

IMDB Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048960/
Share:

The Last of the Mohicans (1920)

The 1992 version of this film got one of my rare 10/10 ratings, so I had some mildly high expectations for this film. Maybe having expectation was the mistake here.

The story is that two sisters are trying to catch up to their father, a British officer, and are being perused by French soldiers and their Indian allies. Aided by the last two surviving Mohican Indians, they attempt to take some shortcuts off the beaten trail trying to catch up to the British unit.

Not sure if I can explain why this wasn't very good. It was just boring, and like I said, my expectations going into this probably made me judge it more.

Included in the National Film Archive and not on any other top film lists, just watch the new version it was fantastic, and this original pales in comparison.

Vote: 4/10

IMDB Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0011387/
Share:

Sherlock Holmes (2009)

This film is directed by Guy Ritchie, who's last film was RocknRolla, which should have told me that this would be a British movie that is hard to understand. Don't get me wrong, I really liked RocknRolla, but you have to accept that you aren't going to be able to understand everything the characters are saying.

Ritchie modeled this movie as a "bromance", Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law play Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson, respectively. The strange thing about this movie is they play doctors with the typical Sherlock Holmes ability to detect clues from minute details, and they are also bad-ass fighters. So brain and brawn, in a strange mix. Holmes is basically a bum for a good part of the movie, making money from fighting. His "bromance" with the clean cut Dr. Watson is an unnecessary spin on the film, distracting from the case they are trying to solve, and not the chemistry that really fit this film.

It was pretty good, probably fun on a big screen since it has some nice explosions and action sequences around the construction of a ship and bridge. I just doubt I will want to see it again, but I'm sure they will plan a sequel.

Vote: 7/10

IMDB Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0988045/
Share:

Australia (2008)

I had negative feelings about this film going into it, and for the first 30 minutes of the film I didn't know if I could finish it. With slapstick comedic moments, mixed with drama, romance, and adventure, this film lacked direction completely. Then after a waste of an hour and 15 minutes it turned into an emotional epic which it should have been in the first place.

Director Baz Luhrmann is an Australian, and this was his first feature film since Moulin Rouge! (2001). So now he is a Musical Director crossing over into everything else at once? Nicole Kidman has another failure in my eyes, she has been unable to succeed in anything but children's movies since Cold Mountain in 2003. I'd rather not take the time to comment on those said failures such as The Stepford Wives , Birth, and The Interpreter. Hugh Jackman's best performance last year was as the host of the Oscars, and being Australian himself I completely forgive him for being in this awful movie. He was one of the only redeeming qualities in this very long directionless film.

Save yourself two and a half hours and watch something else.

Vote: 4/10

IMDB Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0455824/
Share:

Rip blogspot

Nổi Bật